Performance of Bt. Cotton Cultivation in
Report of
State Department of
Agriculture
In
In
1.
Plant Height
2.
No. of Squares
3.
No. of flowers
4.
No. of Green bolls
5.
Jassids damage
6.
Aphids damage
7.
White fly damage
8.
No. of Spudoptera
larvae
9.
No. of Helicoverpa
larvae
10.
No. of Pink Bollworm larvae
11.
No. of Spotted Bollworm larvae
The Bt. Cotton plants are less in height ,No. of squares, No. of flowers, No. of Bolls etc.
are more than non Bt. cotton. However No significant differences was observed.
During Kharif 2002-2003 heavy infestation was not noticed on both Bt. and
non-Bt. cotton varieties. On an average
The Bollworm attack was reported on Bt.
cotton crop at Anand Niketan
College of Agriculture, Warora farm. The Principal, Anand Niketan Collage of
Agriculture, Warora has suggested the need to carry
out more research on quantity of ICP (Intestinal Crystal Proteins) present in
leaves, flowers and bolls, so that, larva will be killed within 24 hrs.
Many complaints about wilt infestation were
received from
As this was the first year of Bt.
cultivation and only 39000 packets were available for
The comparison between Bt. and its non Bt.
counterpart about yield it reangaes between 16.30 to
60.07% but as per the feedback of the officers the performance of Bt. cotton as
compared with other popular hybrids varieties like NCS-145 (Bunny) Ankur 651, Brahma, Paras etc. is
not satisfactory. These non Bt. varieties yield better than the Bt. Varieties.
The Cost of the Bt. Cotton seed is also a
major point of consideration. The Cost fixed by Mahyco is Rs.
1600/- packet which cannot be a justifiable cost
Purpose
of Survey
As Kharif 2002-2003 is the first year of
the Commercial release of Bt. cotton hybrids:
1.
To analyse the performance of Bt.
cotton hybrids.
2.
To study the farmers reactions about Bt.
cotton cultivation.
Material
and Methods
A trainers training was organized at CICR,
Cotton
Scenario in
1.
About 97% of the cotton crop is cultivated
under rainfed condition.
2.
The cotton is mostly grown on soils, which
are black in colour and called as black cotton soil.
The black colour of the soil is due to presence of
titanium oxide.
3.
In
4.
The yield level of seed cotton is very
poor.
5.
Most of the cotton varieties and hybrids
grown in this State process medium and medium long fiber.
6.
The cotton crop is grown in the Kharif
season and sowing is generally done with onset of Monsoon.
7.
The hybrids cotton covers about 73% of
cotton area in the State; about 11% area is covered by improved hrisutum varieties and 16% by arboreum
cultivars.
Cotton crop is grown in the entire State
except Konkan and eastern
(i) Vidarbha region: Yeotmal,
(ii) Marathwada region: Nanded, Hingoli, Parbhani,
(iii) Khandesh region: Jalgaon, Dhule & Nandurbar districts
(iv)
The average productivity of cotton in the
State is 155 kg lint per ha as against 357 kg in Andhra Pradesh, 452 kg in Punjab, 399 kg in Haryana and 274 kg in Karnataka.
The area wise production and productivity
since 1994-95 to 2001-2002 and estimated targets of area production and
productivity for 2002-2003 is as below:
|
S. No. |
Year |
Area (Lakh ha) |
Production (Lakh bales) |
Productivity (Kg lint/ha) |
|
1. |
1995-96 |
30.85 |
29.94 |
165 |
|
2. |
1996-97 |
30.85 |
31.43 |
173 |
|
3. |
1997-98 |
31.39 |
17.53 |
95 |
|
4. |
1998-99 |
31.99 |
26.18 |
137 |
|
5. |
1999-2000 |
32.54 |
31.26 |
163 |
|
6. |
2000-2001 |
27.93 |
14.57 |
89 |
|
7. |
2001-2002 |
30.00 |
27.98 |
158 |
|
8. |
2002-2003 (T) |
26.17 (T) |
19.22 (T) |
125 (T) |
The main reason for low productivity of
cotton on
Bt.
Cotton cultivation and its evaluation
The information about total Bt. cotton seed
packets distributed and district-wise area covered under Bt. cotton is as
under.
|
S.
No. |
Name
of the District |
Bt.
cotton packets distributed (No.) |
Area
Covered (Ha) |
|
1. |
Jalgaon |
1,964 |
785.6 |
|
2. |
Dhule |
4,132 |
1,652.8 |
|
3. |
Nandurbar |
1,650 |
660.0 |
|
|
7,746 |
3,098.4 |
|
|
4. |
|
2,828 |
1,131.2 |
|
5. |
Jalna |
2,018 |
807.2 |
|
6. |
Beed |
593 |
237.2 |
|
|
5,439 |
2,175.6 |
|
|
7. |
Parbhani / Hongoli |
3,153 |
1,261.2 |
|
8. |
Nanded |
3,194 |
1,277.6 |
|
9. |
Latur |
30 |
12.0 |
|
Latur
Division |
6,377 |
2,550.8 |
|
|
10. |
|
1,006 |
402.4 |
|
11. |
|
1,090 |
436.0 |
|
12. |
Buldhana |
1,410 |
564.0 |
|
13. |
Yotmal |
5,068 |
2,027.2 |
|
|
8,574 |
3,429.6 |
|
|
14. |
Wardha |
836 |
334.4 |
|
15. |
|
732 |
292.8 |
|
16. |
Chandrapur |
748 |
299.2 |
|
|
2,316 |
926.4 |
|
|
17. |
Others |
33 |
13.2 |
|
|
30,485 |
12,194 |
|
As such 30485 packets of Bt. cotton were
sown on 12194 ha area in
Commissionerate of Agriculture has been
conducting field evaluation report of the standing crop on different characters
to study usefulness of the technology.
The detailed training on package of
practices and instructions regarding preparation of report was given in the
training. The guidelines were also issued.
A trainers training programme was organized
at Central Institute of Cotton research, Nagpur for training the trainers for
taking field observation of Bt. cotton crop in every district. The trainers
were instructed to conduct field level trainings. A district level committee
was established at each district to prepare evaluation report. The members of
the committee were as below.
1. District
Superintending Agriculture Officer Chairman
2. Officers
who has attended training at CICR Member
3. Agriculture
Development Officer Member
4. Sub-divisional
Agriculture Officer Member
5. University
Expert Member
6. Taluka Agriculture Officer Member
The observations on 904 plots were recorded
through out
Division-wise area under Bt. cotton and
observations taken are as below:
|
S.
No. |
Division |
Area
under Bt. cotton in ha. |
Observations
recorded |
|
1. |
|
926.40 |
139 |
|
2. |
|
3429.60 |
217 |
|
3. |
|
2175.60 |
210 |
|
4. |
Latur |
2550.80 |
188 |
|
5. |
|
3098.40 |
150 |
|
6. |
Others |
13.20 |
--- |
|
|
Total |
12194.00 |
904 |
As per the directives of the CICR the
observations are recorded on Bt. Cotton plants and its non Bt. Counter part.
The results are based on these observations. The Committee was also instructed
to compare the performance of Bt. cotton varieties with most popular hybrids
varieties in the locality.
The highlights of the reports are as below.
1. Physical characters: The Bt. Cotton plants are less in
height/ No. of squares, No. of flowers, No. of Bolls etc. are more than non Bt.
cotton.
2. Disease and pest incidence: During Kharif 2002-2003 no heavy
infestation was noticed on both Bt. and non-Bt. cotton varieties. On an overage
a. Sucking Pests: The attack of sucking pests was reported on both
Bt. & Non Bt. cotton varieties.
(i) Aphids and Jassid: On an average 5 to 10 % infestation was reported on both Bt.
& Non Bt. Cotton varieties.
(ii) Thrips: On an average 3 to 5% infestation was reported
on both Bt. & Non Bt. Cotton varieties.
(iii) White
fly: On an average 5 to 8%
infestation was reported on Bt. & Non Bt. cotton varieties
b. Bollworm:
(i) Till August, 2002 no infestation of
bollworm was reported.
(ii) During
September, October and November, 2002 infestation was reported on both Bt. and
Non Bt. cotton. The level of infestation was marginally more in non Bt. cotton
varieties (7 to 12%) than Bt. cotton varieties (5 to 7%). The number of larvae per plant observed on both Bt. & Non Bt.
cotton varieties are as below.
|
S.
No. |
Name
of Bollworm |
Average
No. of larvae / Plant |
|
|
|
|
Bt.
cotton varieties |
Non
- Bt. cotton varieties |
|
1. |
American Bollworm |
1.5 to 2.5 |
2 to 3.5 |
|
2. |
Spotted Bollworm |
0.1 to 0.5 |
0.1 to 0.5 |
|
3. |
Pink Bollworm |
0.07 to 0.1 |
0.22 to 0.30 |
The Bollworm attack was reported on Bt.
cotton crop at Anand Niketan
College of Agriculture, Warora farm. The principal, Anand Niketan College of
Agriculture, Warora has suggested the need to carry
out more research on quantity of ICP (Intestinal Crystal Proteins) present in
leaves. Flowers and bolls, so that, larvae will be killed
within 24 hrs. As per the report of CICR committee the attack of
bollworm is reported at Anandvan College of Agriculture
farm. But the attack was below ETL (Economic Threshold Level)
C. Wilting
Many Complaints about Susceptibility of
wilting were received from
3. Yield: The
picking-wise yield observations recorded on Bt. cotton and its non-Bt. cotton
part are as below:
Bt.
Cotton
|
S.
No. |
Division |
First
picking (Kg. / ha.) |
Second
picking (Kg. / ha.) |
Third
picking (Kg. / ha.) |
Fourth
picking (Kg. / ha.) |
Total
Yield (Kg. / ha.) |
|
1. |
|
237.1 |
390.07 |
342.14 |
233.96 |
1,212.23 |
|
2. |
|
430.4 |
255.6 |
166.74 |
--- |
852.74 |
|
3. |
|
348.1 |
562.32 |
458.03 |
292.83 |
1,736.34 |
|
4. |
Latur |
240.63 |
305.5 |
229.38 |
118.00 |
888.5 |
|
5. |
|
262.73 |
525.19 |
707.31 |
689.46 |
2,184.69 |
|
|
Total |
1,618.96 |
2,038.68 |
2,003.06 |
1,337.25 |
6,874.5 |
|
|
Average |
323.79 |
407.74 |
400.72 |
266.85 |
1,374.9 |
Non-Bt.
Cotton
|
S. No |
Division |
First picking (Kg / ha) |
Second picking (Kg / ha) |
Third picking (Kg / ha) |
Fourth picking (Kg /ha) |
Total Yield (Kg / ha) |
% increase |
|
1. |
|
159.3 |
201.80 |
265.18 |
100.1 |
876.28 |
27.71 |
|
2. |
|
285.47 |
178.42 |
142.73 |
107.06 |
713.68 |
16.30 |
|
3. |
|
238.01 |
385.99 |
376.36 |
187.84 |
1,193.89 |
30.57 |
|
4. |
Latur |
177.75 |
209.38 |
161.25 |
77.25 |
625.63 |
29.57 |
|
5. |
|
168.65 |
339.85 |
427.38 |
376.42 |
1,312.31 |
60.07 |
|
|
Total |
1,028.78 |
1,315.44 |
1,372.90 |
848.67 |
4,721.49 |
164.22 |
|
|
Average |
205.76 |
263.09 |
274.58 |
169.73 |
944.3 |
32.84 |
From the above observations it is clear
that the percentage yield increase of Bt. over it's
counter part ranges between 16 to 60%.
As per the feed back of the field level
officers all though the performance of Bt. over its non Bt. Counter parts are
better, but its performance, as compared with other popular non Bt. hybrids
like (NCS - 145) (Bunny) Ankur 651, Paras, Brahma, is not better.
The feedback received from most of the
farmers of the state is as follows:
(i) The average boll weight of Mahyco Bt.
Cotton Varieties is 300 gm / 100 bolls i.e. 3 gm / boll which is very less as compared with other non Bt. popular hybrids
which is 550 to 600 gm / 100 bolls.
(ii) The
staple length of the Bt. cotton varieties is also short and hence it fetches
fewer prices in market compared with other popular hybrids.
(iii) The
Bt. cotton varieties show more susceptibility to wilting under heavy rains
compared to other popular varieties.
(iv) There should also be a mechanism to control the
cost of B. T. Cotton Seeds. In this particular year the cost of only 450 gm
Packet of B.T. Cotton seeds of Mahyco is Rs 1600/-
which is not justifiable in any case. In the initial years the Government should
control the cost of the seeds.
ISSUES
RELATED TO USE OF B. T.
The use of genetic engineering and the G.
M. plants comes under Environment Protection Act and the rules and orders made
there under. Under Seeds Act, 1966, seeds Rules, 1968 and Seeds Control Order,
1983 the use of Genetically modified crops varieties
is not considered. To monitor this in the State:
1. The
central Government should notify the minimum standards and also the methods of
testing the seeds in notified laboratories.
2. The
inspectors should be appointed and the duties and powers should be specified.
3.
The strict provisions should be made
against the sellers of spurious or fake seeds and F2 seeds of G. M. Crops.
For Commissioner
of Agriculture
Government of